16 research outputs found

    On the Communication Complexity of Secret Key Generation in the Multiterminal Source Model

    Full text link
    Communication complexity refers to the minimum rate of public communication required for generating a maximal-rate secret key (SK) in the multiterminal source model of Csiszar and Narayan. Tyagi recently characterized this communication complexity for a two-terminal system. We extend the ideas in Tyagi's work to derive a lower bound on communication complexity in the general multiterminal setting. In the important special case of the complete graph pairwise independent network (PIN) model, our bound allows us to determine the exact linear communication complexity, i.e., the communication complexity when the communication and SK are restricted to be linear functions of the randomness available at the terminals.Comment: A 5-page version of this manuscript will be submitted to the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT 2014

    On the Public Communication Needed to Achieve SK Capacity in the Multiterminal Source Model

    Full text link
    The focus of this paper is on the public communication required for generating a maximal-rate secret key (SK) within the multiterminal source model of Csisz{\'a}r and Narayan. Building on the prior work of Tyagi for the two-terminal scenario, we derive a lower bound on the communication complexity, RSKR_{\text{SK}}, defined to be the minimum rate of public communication needed to generate a maximal-rate SK. It is well known that the minimum rate of communication for omniscience, denoted by RCOR_{\text{CO}}, is an upper bound on RSKR_{\text{SK}}. For the class of pairwise independent network (PIN) models defined on uniform hypergraphs, we show that a certain "Type S\mathcal{S}" condition, which is verifiable in polynomial time, guarantees that our lower bound on RSKR_{\text{SK}} meets the RCOR_{\text{CO}} upper bound. Thus, PIN models satisfying our condition are RSKR_{\text{SK}}-maximal, meaning that the upper bound RSKRCOR_{\text{SK}} \le R_{\text{CO}} holds with equality. This allows us to explicitly evaluate RSKR_{\text{SK}} for such PIN models. We also give several examples of PIN models that satisfy our Type S\mathcal S condition. Finally, we prove that for an arbitrary multiterminal source model, a stricter version of our Type S\mathcal S condition implies that communication from \emph{all} terminals ("omnivocality") is needed for establishing a SK of maximum rate. For three-terminal source models, the converse is also true: omnivocality is needed for generating a maximal-rate SK only if the strict Type S\mathcal S condition is satisfied. Counterexamples exist that show that the converse is not true in general for source models with four or more terminals.Comment: Submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1504.0062

    Achieving SK Capacity in the Source Model: When Must All Terminals Talk?

    Full text link
    In this paper, we address the problem of characterizing the instances of the multiterminal source model of Csisz\'ar and Narayan in which communication from all terminals is needed for establishing a secret key of maximum rate. We give an information-theoretic sufficient condition for identifying such instances. We believe that our sufficient condition is in fact an exact characterization, but we are only able to prove this in the case of the three-terminal source model. We also give a relatively simple criterion for determining whether or not our condition holds for a given multiterminal source model.Comment: A 5-page version of this paper was submitted to the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT 2014

    Secret Key Agreement under Discussion Rate Constraints

    Full text link
    For the multiterminal secret key agreement problem, new single-letter lower bounds are obtained on the public discussion rate required to achieve any given secret key rate below the secrecy capacity. The results apply to general source model without helpers or wiretapper's side information but can be strengthened for hypergraphical sources. In particular, for the pairwise independent network, the results give rise to a complete characterization of the maximum secret key rate achievable under a constraint on the total discussion rate

    On the Optimality of Secret Key Agreement via Omniscience

    Full text link
    For the multiterminal secret key agreement problem under a private source model, it is known that the maximum key rate, i.e., the secrecy capacity, can be achieved through communication for omniscience, but the omniscience strategy can be strictly suboptimal in terms of minimizing the public discussion rate. While a single-letter characterization is not known for the minimum discussion rate needed for achieving the secrecy capacity, we derive single-letter lower and upper bounds that yield some simple conditions for omniscience to be discussion-rate optimal. These conditions turn out to be enough to deduce the optimality of omniscience for a large class of sources including the hypergraphical sources. Through conjectures and examples, we explore other source models to which our methods do not easily extend

    The Communication Complexity of Achieving SK Capacity in a Class of PIN Models

    No full text
    The communication complexity of achieving secret key (SK) capacity in the multiterminal source model of Csiszar and Narayan is the minimum rate of public communication required to generate a maximal-rate SK. It is well known that the minimum rate of communication for omniscience, denoted by R-CO, is an upper bound on the communication complexity, denoted by R-SK. A source model for which this upper bound is tight is called R-SK-maximal. In this paper, we establish a sufficient condition for R-SK-maximality within the class of pairwise independent network (PIN) models defined on hypergraphs. This allows us to compute R-SK exactly within the class of PIN models satisfying this condition. On the other hand, we also provide a counterexample that shows that our condition does not in general guarantee R-SK-maximality for sources beyond PIN models
    corecore